Scientific Anglers Sharkskin Fly Line Review

3M Scientific Angler Sharkskin Line

Yesterday, for the first time I experienced firsthand the new hubbub in fly line technology.  Sharkskin, made by Scientific Anglers, a 3M company, has made waves in the fly fishing industry; the latest greatest, which every fly fisherman must try for himself.  Personally, I like it; however, as I am sure most everyone knows, it not only has its diehard supporters, but also some venomous naysayers.  When I say it is something every angler must try for himself, I mean that earnestly.  I am sure that for some, it is just not their cup of tea, and understandably, it does have some limitations.  If it’s worth anything, here is my general perception and opinion of the line itself.  In terms of castability, from a tight loop to a well presented roll cast, Sharkskin can do it all.  I was also impressed with the line’s versatility as it loads well on a variety of line weights and actions.  In addition, the line seemed to meet my demands and expectations in regards to accuracy, presentation, shootability and responsiveness.  In my mind, Shark Skin’s most enviable accolade lies in its nearly complete and utter lack of memory.  Talk about an innovation, a fly line with virtually zero memory…priceless. 

In line with the design concept, the line has a mechanized, micro-replicated embossed texture, which ultimately decreases surface tension allowing the line to travel with greater ease through of eyelets of a rod.  I will attest to this; the line is extremely quick and seems to fly through the rod tip with higher speed and shooting power.  In addition, this pattern, which creates tiny valleys on the fly line, increases it’s floatability by limiting surface tension and creating air pockets between line and water.  By means of this patterned characteristic, SA claims it translates directly to the ease of picking up line; like a rain shedding tire, the textural surface sloughs water off the fly line. And with the line having this higher floatation, you will experience a decrease in drag as well.  In so facto, therein lies one of Sharkskin’s most widespread and vocal complaints…NOISE. If you have heard the rumor, believe it.  The stuff is not meant for fish with ears, as this glorious fly line innovation creates a whizzing auditory effect while passing through the rod guides.  To some it is pure cacophony, but to anglers like avid Beaufort, SC Spottail fisherman Martin Dudley, that so called cacophony is simply “joyful noise”.  The sound of that line ripping and shooting, running and stripping is music to some anglers’ ears.  Good for Sharkskin, this noise does not correlate with the line wearing on eyelets nor a deterioration to any part of the rod or real.  With regards to durability, Sharkskin is tested to be two to three times more durable than conventional fly lines; whether or not this is true, only time will tell. A second downfall to this textured design will remind you of 9^th grade gym class: rope burn.  From speaking with fisherman who have used Sharkskin while in pursuit of larger query, a tormented tarpon on the run could run your fingers raw.  Like any fly fishing commodity, you have to pay to play and priced at $99 Sharkskin is on average $40 more expensive than most conventional lines.  All in all, I am a big fan, but as I alluded to, this line may not be meant for just every angler so cast it yourself and find out.    -Kevney

Comments

[montana fly fishing]

A lot of our clients are using sharkskin. Not sure if I like all the noise it makes shooting threw the guides though.